Wednesday, February 26, 2020

Journal 3 Article Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Journal 3 - Article Example It will be appropriate to distinguish the two. The second thing is to focus on the goals through defining the mission of the group. In the above case, the mission will be to successfully complete the project from hardware implementation to software installation. The third thing is to clarify the position of all the member of your group. This will help define the role of every individual. After doing this, the fourth step is to make the roles and identity of all the group members’ official. Using the above example, each members will be told to handle the assigned duty whether on software or hardware as intended. This will make each individual accomplish his target. What you do not know about decision making By default, decision making is one of the most important tasks of a senior executive; that is why they are referred to as managers. Many people presume that this is a very hard task, without acknowledging the fact that it might as well be the simplest task, if certain things are taken into consideration. In order to achieve this, they must first accept that decision making is a process and that two methods are used. The first method is advocacy and the other method is inquiry. Each of these processes will come in handy during varying situations. The next thing that executive members should take into account is that decision making at times is the work of a collective of executives. Because of this, not all the time people will share the same idea. Therefore, if they disagree, they should do it in a manner that is constructive. In such scenarios, it is essential that both teams structure a debate which will either take the design of point-counterpoint or the intellectual watchdog. After they all arrive at a decision, they should test this putting a number of considerations in place. With all the above taken into account, the idea of decision making becomes very easy. "Man’s Search for Meaning" In the book "Man’s Search for Meaning", there are many lessons for each and every leader in this society. According to this text, a leader’s job is to ensure that there is existence of meaning and purpose to his or her subjects. In his book, the author Frankly clearly puts out the essence of these two in an individual’s life. The setting of this book is in a prison where as a psychiatrist, Frankl was imprisoned during the world war. He wondered how other prisoners were able to survive the harsh conditions. Later, he was able to find out that the motivation they had was the will to meaning. Therefore as leaders, it is essential that we instill meaning to those who we serve because it is that which will keep them moving even through the difficult times they go through in achieving their goals. Section B The â€Å"Ultimate Meaning† of Viktor Frankl (On Moodle) The study of The â€Å"Ultimate Meaning† of Viktor Frankl is one that shifts the whole issue of leadership to a new level. In this discussion God as the provider of wisdom gets involved. In his search to define the â€Å"ultimate meaning† Frankl was only able to make in his last book â€Å"Mans search for the ultimate meaning, which this discussion is based. There comes the introduction of the ultimate destiny of man through the Urantia book. If one digs deep into the details of this discussion, it gets clearly portrayed that man tends to deal with facts, which sometime do not apply, while religion deals with values.

Monday, February 10, 2020

Lab report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 3

Lab Report Example For the second cycle, the mass of the water alone is the mass of the crucible lid and hydrate, less the mass of the crucible lid and residue after heating. That gives 22.678 – 22.455 = 0.223. Considering the fact that the second cycle represents a time when more accuracy is sought as opposed to the first cycle, the mass from the second cycle is taken for use in the establishment of the % of the water of hydration. The % of water of hydration is equal to the mass of the water of hydration alone, divided by the mass of the hydrated salt and the result multiplied by 100%. That gives, (0.223 / 0.636 ) * 100 = 4% to the nearest whole number. It is apparent that the experiment manifested that the percentage of the water of hydration is 4% as opposed to the theoretical value which is 5%. This may be attributed to the fact that there are some errors in the experiment that result from such attributes as impurities entering the reagents; zero error introduced in the measuring instruments and parallax error on the side of the personnel taking the readings from the instruments. The experiment however proved that indeed there is water of hydration in the reagent and that has weight which is shade off by heating the